logo Standing Up To Powerful Interests

Consumer Protection News

SearchRSS Feed

For Immediate Release:
11/8/2006
For More Information:
Laura Etherton
(503) 231-4181 (Ext. 305)

Insurance Industry's $5 Million Ad Barrage Sinks Measure 42: Consumer advocates say misleading ads caused confusion

Consumer advocates vow to fight on to protect Oregon consumers even though the insurance industry spent $5 million to kill Measure 42, a consumer protection measure to stop insurance companies from using credit scores to raise insurance rates.

“It’s outrageous that out-of-state insurance companies poured millions into Oregon trying to confuse voters with an onslaught of misleading television ads,” said Laura Etherton, OSPIRG consumer advocate.

"Unfortunately, the insurance industry's $5 million campaign against Measure 42 created a lot of confusion about what was at stake on election day," said Norma Garcia, Senior Staff Attorney with Consumers Union. "Credit scoring is unfair when it comes to insurance. Many good drivers and responsible homeowners get stuck with higher premiums just because insurance companies think their credit score is not high enough. Even consumers with good credit can pay more than they should because of this unfair practice."

In 2003 the Oregon Legislature gave some Oregonians protections against the use of credit history for insurance renewal rate setting and cancellations. Measure 42 would have extended these same protections to new customers, including those who are previously insured but switch insurance companies, so that all Oregonians could enjoy the same rights.

Although Measure 42 was defeated, the problems for consumers when insurance companies use credit data remain. Consumers Union and OSPIRG urged the Oregon Legislature and state regulators to step in and level the playing field by extending protections to new policyholders who deserve the same protections from the unfair consequences of credit scoring.

Protections would be necessary to protect consumers from being penalized with higher rates because of lower credit scores caused, for example, by filing a medical bankruptcy, owing higher balances on credit cards, being a victim of identity theft or having an error on a credit report. Garcia and Etherton point out factors like these do not make the consumer a worse driver, or more likely to have a house fire.

OSPIRG and Consumers Union believe that how much consumers pay for insurance should depend primarily upon factors directly related to the insured activity in rate setting, such as a consumer’s driving experience and record in auto insurance, and the safety of a home in homeowners insurance.

“Insurance ought to be fair and transparent for consumers,” said Etherton, “Credit scoring just doesn’t belong.”

###

Oregon State Public Interest Research Group (OSPIRG) is a statewide non-profit non-partisan public interest advocate. OSPIRG’s mission is to deliver persistent, result-oriented public interest activism that protects our environment, encourages a fair, sustainable economy, and fosters responsive, democratic government.

Consumers Union, publisher of Consumer Reports, is an independent, nonprofit testing and information organization serving only the consumer. We are a comprehensive source of unbiased advice about products and services, personal finance, health nutrition, and other consumer concerns. Since 1936, our mission has been to test products, inform the public, and protect consumers.

SEARCH THIS SITE