logo Standing Up To Powerful Interests

Testimony Archive

SearchRSS Feed

CONSUMER PROTECTION TESTIMONY

Protecting Consumers from the Payday Loan Debt Trap


Oregon Senate Interim Consumer Protection Committee

Thank you, Chair Prozanski and members of the committee, for the opportunity to testify here today on the topic of payday loans. My name is Laura Etherton, and I’m OSPIRG’s Consumer Advocate. OSPIRG, Oregon State Public Interest Research Group, is a non-profit, non-partisan public interest organization.

Payday loans are short term, high interest rate loans marketed to consumers desperate for quick cash, who borrow against their next paycheck. If the borrower cannot repay the loan when due, the lender typically encourages him to pay a high fee to “roll over” the loan for another short term.

Recent OSPIRG surveys in Portland and in Lane County found that payday loan outfits commonly charge consumers a staggering 521% annual interest rate. The studies found that a typical payday loan works in the following way:

To borrow $300, a consumer must write a personal check for $360, post-dated for about two weeks ahead. If the consumer is unable to repay the entire loan on the due date, he may “roll over” the loan to extend it for another two weeks, for another fee of $60. The loan may be rolled over three times, each for a fee of $60 that does not pay down the principal, and does not result in any additional cash for the borrower.

If the borrower rolls over the loan the three times allowed in Oregon, this borrower -- initially desperate for $300 -- pays $240 in fees and owes $300 in loan principal. To keep up with the mounting fees and inescapable debt, a consumer may even take out additional payday loans to pay off the first.

In addition to charging outrageous rates, payday loans are very difficult for borrowers to repay. Borrowers are typically required to pay back the loan in a single payment – not installments – and to do so after an extremely short loan term of days or weeks.

Despite the difficulty borrowers have in paying back the initial loan on the due date, payday lenders do not typically require a credit check to determine a consumer’s ability to repay the loan. Instead, the lender is able to rely on direct access to the borrower account, and can put through the consumer’s post-dated check repeatedly to recover the loan amount.

Given the problems with payday loans, momentum is building for meaningful reform in Oregon. We recommend consumer protections include strong limits on interest and fees, reducing the number of rollovers, and extending the loan term to at least 31 days. In addition, Oregon should give consumers other protections such as the right to cancel the loan within 24 hours, require lenders to design the loans to include paying down the principal with each loan renewal, and make sure consumers are allowed to make installment payments.

Oregon should to enact the strongest possible consumer protections. The proposed ballot measure offers the minimum protections necessary for consumers. On behalf of OSPIRG, I encourage the Legislature not to accept anything less, and to consider enacting stronger reforms.

SEARCH THIS SITE